Wayland Broke My Scripts: Meet wtype, Your New xdotool
My journey from xdotool’s failure in Sway to mastering native Wayland automation.
👋 Hey everyone,
I had one of those “This is why I love Linux” moments this week, immediately followed by a “This is why I sometimes hate Linux” moment. It all started with a simple, beautiful shell script.
As many of you know, I live in my terminal. I’m building a minimalist, keyboard-driven setup on Arch Linux using the Sway window manager. My goal is to optimize every workflow, and a big part of that is creating small, helper scripts. This week, I built a dmoji-sway script—a tiny wmenu-based emoji picker that lets me find an emoji, copies it to my clipboard, and automatically pastes it.
This auto-paste was the magic ingredient. In my old X11/i3 days, I would have just ended the script with xdotool click 2 or xdotool key "ctrl+v".
So, I tried that. And it failed.
It didn’t just fail quietly; it failed completely. The script would run, the emoji would be in my clipboard, but no paste. I was left staring at my cursor, manually pressing Ctrl+V like some kind of barbarian.
This wasn’t just a broken script. This was a crack in my workflow. And it sent me down a rabbit hole that forced me to understand a fundamental shift in the Linux desktop: the death of xdotool and the rise of its successor, wtype.
My Goal This Week 🎯
My goal was simple: fix my dmoji-sway script. But beneath that was a more important goal: to understand why it broke.
I’m a computer engineer; I don’t like “it just doesn’t work.” I need to know the root cause. I didn’t want a hacky workaround, like forcing my terminal to run under XWayland (which defeats the whole purpose of a native Wayland setup).
I needed to find the “Wayland-native” way of simulating keyboard input. I wanted to learn the correct tool for the job, one that respected the new architecture I was embracing.
Hitting The Wall: The “Why” My Scripts Broke 🧱
The wall I hit wasn’t a bug. It was a feature. It was the entire Wayland security model.
For decades, we’ve lived in the X11 world. And X11’s security model can be politely described as “nonexistent.” In an X11 session, any application can, by default, read the keystrokes of any other application. It can see the entire screen. It can send fake mouse clicks and key presses to any window it wants.
This is what xdotool relied on. It was a powerful tool that essentially let you “remote control” your entire desktop from the command line. It was fantastic for automation and terrible for security. Think about it: any simple script, any application you downloaded, could theoretically be a keylogger, watching you type your bank passwords.
Wayland changes the game entirely.
Wayland is built on a “protocol-first” design with security and isolation at its core. In Wayland, applications cannot see each other’s windows. They cannot read each other’s keystrokes. They cannot hijack your mouse. An application can’t even take a screenshot of the whole screen without going through a proper desktop portal that explicitly asks you for permission.
So, when my script tried to run xdotool to send a Ctrl+V to my Alacritty terminal (a native Wayland app), Wayland’s security model did exactly what it was designed to do: it blocked the attempt. It saw an external process trying to “stuff” keys into another window and said, “Nope. Not allowed.”
My old way of thinking was the wall. xdotool wasn’t broken; it was obsolete in this new, secure context.
The Breakthrough Moment: Discovering wtype ✨
My research for a “Wayland xdotool” led me to wtype.
At first glance, it looks like a simple replacement. But it’s fundamentally different, and that’s the beautiful part.
wtype doesn’t “hack” the system. It’s a clean, minimal tool that speaks the correct Wayland protocols to get the job done. Specifically, it uses extensions like virtual-keyboard and virtual-pointer. These are official Wayland protocols designed specifically for automation and accessibility tools.
Instead of just randomly injecting events into the system, wtype politely asks the Wayland compositor (in my case, Sway) to generate keyboard or mouse events on its behalf. Because it uses these official, privileged protocols, the compositor trusts it.
This was my “Aha!” moment. I wasn’t fighting the system anymore. I was finally using a tool that was designed for the system.
The Process & The Code: Using wtype 👨💻
Getting wtype was simple. On my Arch Linux setup, it was just one command:
sudo pacman -S wtype
Once installed, I could immediately test it. I opened my terminal and typed:
# Wait one second, then type "Hello Wayland"
sleep 1 && wtype "Hello Wayland"
I ran it, moved my focus to a text editor, and like magic, the words “Hello Wayland” appeared. The feeling of success was incredible.
Now, for the real test: fixing my dmoji-sway script. I needed to simulate a Ctrl+V (paste) command.
The wtype syntax for this is wonderfully clear.
# My original, broken script logic:
# EMOJI=$(...)
# printf %s "$EMOJI" | wl-copy
# xdotool key "ctrl+v" <-- THIS IS THE BROKEN PART
# The new, working logic:
# ...
EMOJI=$(sed '1,/^exit/d' $0 | wmenu -p "Emoji:" | awk '{print $1}')
if [ -n "$EMOJI" ]; then
printf %s "$EMOJI" | wl-copy
# Give the clipboard a fraction of a second to update
sleep 0.1
# This is the magic line:
wtype -M ctrl -P v -m ctrl
fi
Let’s break down that new wtype command. It’s so elegant:
wtype: The command itself.-M ctrl: This means “Modifier Hold” (-M). It simulates pressing and holding theControlkey.-P v: This means “Press” (-P). It simulates pressing (and immediately releasing) thevkey while theCtrlkey is still held down.-m ctrl: This means “Modifier Release” (-m). It simulates releasing theControlkey.
Together, wtype -M ctrl -P v -m ctrl is the most precise, correct way to simulate a Ctrl+V key combination.
I saved the script. I ran my $mod+period shortcut. The wmenu popped up. I typed “rocket,” hit Enter, and…
🚀
The rocket emoji instantly appeared in my terminal. It was pasted. It worked. Natively.
I can’t overstate how satisfying this was. It wasn’t just a fix; it was an upgrade. I had replaced an old, insecure X11 hack with a modern, secure, and native Wayland solution.
📚 Recommended Resource
This whole journey reminded me how much power is packed into the command line. My simple 15-line shell script ties together sed, wmenu, awk, wl-copy, and wtype—five separate tools—into one seamless workflow.
If this kind of automation excites you, you absolutely must own a copy of The Linux Command Line: A Complete Introduction by William Shotts.
I’ve had this book for years, and I still reference it. It doesn’t just teach you commands; it teaches you how to “think in shell.” It’s the definitive guide to moving from a casual user to a true power user. It covers everything from basic file manipulation to writing complex, robust shell scripts (with proper loops, functions, and error handling).
If you want to build your own custom environment and automate your life, this book is the foundation.
The Linux Command Line: A Complete Introduction
Key Takeaways 📚
- 💡 Wayland’s Security is a Feature, Not a Bug.
xdotoolnot working isn’t a sign that Wayland is “broken.” It’s a sign that Wayland’s superior security model is working. It’s protecting you from the very thingsxdotoolwas built to do. - ⚙️ Use the Right Tool for the Job.
wtypeis the native Wayland successor. It respects the new security architecture and uses official protocols (virtual-keyboard,virtual-pointer) to get the job done safely and reliably. - 📚 Automation Syntax is Simple. For 90% of my use cases, the magic combo is
wtype -M [modifier] -P [key] -m [modifier]. This simple, readable syntax is all you need to port most of your oldxdotoolkey-combo commands.
Thanks for Following ☕
This was a huge win for my minimalist Sway setup. It proved that I’m not “giving up” power by moving to Wayland; I’m just learning a new, better, and more secure way to wield it.
☕ If you found this guide helpful, you can Buy Me a Coffee! Medium Etsy LinkedIn Read More
What’s the first
xdotoolscript you plan on porting towtype? Let me know your automation ideas in the comments!
